Ohio Bans Player-Specific Prop Bets On College Sports

Share:

Logo Ohio Casino Control Commission

Ohio has officially joined the group of states taking a firm stance on the safety and integrity of college sports.

The ban on betting on individual college athlete performance, effective from March 1st, 2024, is Ohio’s answer to the NCAA‘s growing apprehension about gambling-related harm.

This is aimed at curbing not just the potential for match manipulation, but also at reducing the mental and emotional strain on athletes who have become unintended targets of betting scrutiny.

Continue reading below to learn more about the reasons behind the player-specific prop bet ban and its further impact.

The Logic Behind the Ban

The Ohio Casino Control Commission (OCCC) made a significant leap towards protecting NCAA athletes by banning player-specific prop bets on college sports. The NCAA’s compelling request and Ohio Governor Mike DeWine’s unwavering support served as the driving force behind this decision.

The NCAA’s president, Charlie Baker, emphasized the need to protect student-athletes from harassment and the potential dangers of match-fixing.

 

There have been instances where athletes have faced online harassment, threats, and other forms of bad communication from gamblers dissatisfied with the athlete’s performance in relation to bets.

The OCCC, led by Executive Director Matthew Schuler and backed by insightful data, recognized the inherent risks in player-specific bets. Such bets focus on individual performances, like a basketball player’s scoring or a quarterback’s passing yards, turning athletes into targets for those looking to influence outcomes for financial gain.

These risks not only encompass potential harassment from bettors but extend to the broader integrity of sports.

Despite some resistance from sports gaming operators, the consensus among state officials and education leaders leans heavily toward player protection.

Governor DeWine‘s endorsement of the ban, alongside the vocal support from figures like Neil Sullivan of the University of Dayton, underscores a collective commitment to refocusing the betting landscape on team achievements rather than individual performances.

A Closer Look at the Impact

In 2023, the state saw over $104.6 million wagered on NCAA player props alone. This decision, however, is not about the numbers.

It’s a stance on ethics, prioritizing the well-being of young athletes over the appeal of quick profits.

Team workFurthermore, Ohio’s initiative is part of a larger movement to mitigate the negative impacts of gambling on sports. States like New Jersey, Indiana, Virginia, New York, Illinois, and Michigan have bans on individual prop bets on college sports or have more nuanced regulations.

The NCAA’s proactive steps, including the development of e-learning modules on gambling-related harms and advocating for new laws to shield athletes, demonstrate a concerted effort to preserve the sanctity of collegiate sports.

While the ban distinctly separates college athletics from professional sports betting, it opens up a conversation on the future of gambling regulations.

As Ohio takes a definitive stand against player-specific prop bets, it not only protects its athletes but also reinforces the integrity of college sports.

This decision marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue between the gambling industry and sports ethics, paving the way for a future where the well-being of players is held in the highest regard.

 

Ohio has banned player-specific prop bets on NCAA games to protect college athletes and preserve sports integrity.

The ban was effectively implemented in late February 2024.

To curb potential match manipulation and reduce the mental and emotional strain on athletes targeted by bettors.

The NCAA requested the ban, supported by Ohio Governor Mike DeWine.

It shields athletes from harassment and the dangers of match-fixing, focusing on their safety and game integrity.

Yes, the ban specifically targets player-specific prop bets; betting on team outcomes is still allowed.

Yes, states like New Jersey, Indiana, Virginia, New York, Illinois, and Michigan have similar bans or regulations.

The NCAA has developed e-learning modules and advocated for laws to protect athletes from gambling-related harms.

To balance the excitement of sports betting with the ethical need to protect participants and maintain the integrity of sports.

Catie Di Stefano has worked in the gambling industry since 2011 for major brands like Hard Rock Hotel & Casino, Gaming Innovation Group and Betsson Group. She started in customer support at age 19 and has since worked her way through VIP, CRM and Marketing. Today, Catie is passionate about educating players on consumer rights and the best approaches for legal play in the United States as the Director of Community Marketing at OnlineGamblers.com. Catie was born in Indonesia but grew up in Sweden. Currently, she resides in Spain with her two daughters.

Related news

Show all news
1

Ty (Tex) Twine Joins Toppem Sports As Executive Chairman

Exclusive interview with Ty Twine, the new executive chairman of Toppem Sports, on his vision for the company’s future in sports technology.

2

2024 Guide for Top Basketball Cities in the U.S.

Explore the top cities for basketball fans in 2024, including Los Angeles, Boston, and San Francisco. Click here!

3

Betr Moves Closer to Maryland Launch with Initial License Approval

Learn about Betr getting an initial approval for Maryland sports betting license, its challenges and expansion plans. Click here for more!